7 Internal Objections to AI You’ll Hear (and How to Respond Without Rolling Your Eyes)

Let’s be honest: for many higher ed teams, AI feels like the new kid in the office who talks a mile a minute, works at light speed, and doesn’t always follow the rules. You’re intrigued, sure—but also skeptical. And you’re not ready to hand over your data, your job, or your reputation without asking some serious questions first.

In this post, we’re breaking down the most common objections we hear from folks in enrollment, marketing, and student success—and giving you clear, human answers. No hype. No jargon. Just a little calm in the AI storm.

‍

Objection #1: “What about FERPA?”

The fear: “If we use AI, are we putting student data at risk?”

The reality: AI doesn’t get a free pass on privacy. Any responsible tool should be built to meet or exceed existing standards like FERPA. Most AI systems used in education today don’t require sharing identifiable student information to be effective. You can set them up to work with anonymized or de-identified data.

The response: Don’t treat “AI” as a blanket term. Ask your vendors or tech team: What kind of data is being used? Who can see it? Where is it stored? If they can’t answer in plain English, that’s your red flag—not the technology itself.

‍

Objection #2: “Is this going to replace people?”

The fear: “Are we automating ourselves out of a job?”

The reality: AI isn’t here to replace humans—it’s here to offload the work that burns them out. Writing 47 slightly different email reminders? Flagging which students need outreach? Sorting through applications for minor errors? That’s what AI can do fast and well. The magic happens after that—when your team has more time to call the right student, craft a thoughtful message, or design an unforgettable event.

The response: Think of AI like a well-trained intern: it handles the repetitive stuff so your experts can shine. Used well, it amplifies your people—it doesn’t edge them out.

‍

Objection #3: “It’s too early for us.”

The fear: “Other schools might be ready. We’re not there yet.”

The reality: No school feels ready. But waiting for the “perfect time” means missing the low-risk, high-reward ways to start. You don’t need to roll out a full AI strategy overnight. Start with one use case: maybe it’s rewriting subject lines, summarizing long meeting notes, or drafting content for your website.

The response: Getting started isn’t about having everything figured out—it’s about picking one pain point and testing whether AI can lighten the load. You’ll learn faster than you think, and you don’t have to go all in to get real value.

‍

Objection #4: “We don’t want to lose our human touch.”

The fear: “If we let AI talk to students, won’t it feel…robotic?”

The reality: It can. But it doesn’t have to. The best use of AI is behind the scenes—supporting your team so they can sound more human, not less. Think of it as a writing coach, not a replacement voice. You still set the tone, review the message, and hit send. The AI just helps you get there faster (and maybe even better).

The response: Don’t judge AI by the worst automated message you’ve seen. Judge it by whether it helps your team communicate with more care and clarity. That’s the bar. If it can’t meet it, don’t use it. But don’t rule it out before you try.

‍

Objection #5: “We’re worried about bias.”

The fear: “What if AI reinforces inequities we’re trying to fix?”

The reality: This is a real concern, and the solution is transparency and control. Most biases don’t come from AI itself, but from the data and instructions it’s given. That’s why it's important to use tools that allow you to see how decisions are made and give you the ability to step in, adjust, and override.

The response: AI isn’t automatically fair or unfair. It’s a reflection of the humans who build and train it. If your institution values equity, you can and should shape your AI use accordingly, with intentional design, regular audits, and clear values baked in.

‍

The Sanity Check

Before you dismiss AI or dive in headfirst, ask yourself:

• Are we clear on what problem we’re trying to solve?
  
  
• Have we explored a low-risk way to test it?
  
  
• Do we have clear boundaries for privacy, transparency, and equity?
  
  
• Will this help our people do their best work, not replace them?
  
  

AI isn’t a magic wand or a ticking time bomb. It’s a tool. And like any tool, its impact depends on how you use it.

So take a breath. Get curious. And take the first step, not the final leap. You might be more ready than you think.