The AI Workforce for Higher Ed is Here |

Talk to a Bolt Agent
EP
34
August 9, 2024
Episode 34: Ice Cream, Sharks, and Phlebotomists: Correlation vs. Causation in Higher Education Studies

Ice Cream, Sharks, and Phlebotomists: Correlation vs. Causation in Higher Education Studies

Or listen on:

About the Episode

About the Episode: 

In this episode of the EduData Podcast, hosts Jamie and Timothy dive head-first into the critical distinction between correlation and causation within higher education research. They revisit last week's discussion on ROI in higher and lower-income serving institutions and expand the conversation to explore how studies often grapple with the challenge of proving cause and effect. Jamie and Timothy offer insightful examples, such as the seemingly bizarre correlations between ice cream sales and shark attacks, to illustrate the complexities and limitations of observational research. They emphasize the importance of critical thinking and the cautious interpretation of study results. Tune in to understand why correlation does not imply causation and how to navigate the nuances of educational data research.

Key Takeaways

  • Correlation ≠ Causation: Understanding this distinction is vital when analyzing data, especially in higher education research. Not all relationships imply causality.
  • Observational vs. Experimental Studies: Higher education relies heavily on observational data, which limits the ability to draw causal conclusions.
  • Lurking Variables: Unseen factors often influence correlations, making it essential to critically evaluate the data.
  • Critical Consumption of Studies: Always review study limitations and approach findings with a balanced mix of skepticism and appreciation.
  • Practical Applications in Higher Ed: While perfect causation may be elusive, patterns in data still provide actionable insights for improving student success and institutional ROI.

Episode Summary

What Is the Difference Between Correlation and Causation?

Jamie and Timothy start by unpacking the core concept of the episode: the difference between correlation and causation. Correlation identifies a relationship between two variables but does not confirm that one causes the other. This distinction is often misunderstood, leading to misleading conclusions in research. Using quirky examples—like the correlation between U.S. household fruit spending and Canadian railway stock prices—they highlight how unrelated factors can show statistically significant relationships without being causally linked.

How Do Observational Studies Compare to Experimental Research?

Higher education data is almost exclusively observational, meaning researchers analyze existing data without manipulating variables. Unlike experimental studies, which can prove causation through controlled environments, observational studies can only demonstrate correlation. Timothy explains the scientific rigor required for reliable conclusions and why true causation is nearly impossible to establish in human-centered fields like higher education.

The hosts emphasize the importance of experimental design in other fields, such as medicine, and the lack of such designs in higher ed research. They note that while observational data cannot prove causality, it still offers invaluable insights into trends and patterns.

What Are Some Real-World Examples of Misinterpreted Correlations?

Jamie and Timothy introduce humorous examples to drive home the complexity of interpreting correlations. From the link between ice cream sales and shark attacks to the decline of the name Christopher correlating with fewer burglaries in Oklahoma, they underscore how spurious correlations can mislead if not carefully analyzed.

In higher education, Timothy shares a practical example: correlating teacher salaries with beer sales might seem bizarre until a lurking variable—city population size—is factored in. These illustrations remind listeners to critically assess data, especially in higher ed, where numerous factors impact outcomes like enrollment and student success.

Why Is Critical Evaluation of Data Crucial in Higher Education?

The conversation shifts to practical advice for higher education professionals. Jamie and Timothy stress the importance of scrutinizing study limitations and understanding the context of data collection. They encourage listeners to balance skepticism with an appreciation for the insights research can offer, urging professionals to use patterns in data to inform—but not dictate—decision-making.

Connect With Our Co-Hosts:

Jamie Boggs
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiewboggs/

Timothy Davis
https://www.linkedin.com/in/davis-timothy/

About The Enrollify Podcast Network: The EduData Podcast is a part of the Enrollify Podcast Network. If you like this podcast, chances are you’ll like other Enrollify shows too!  

Some of our favorites include Generation AI and The Higher Ed Geek.

Enrollify is made possible by Element451 —  the next-generation AI student engagement platform helping institutions create meaningful and personalized interactions with students. Learn more at element451.com

People in this episode

Host

Jamie Boggs is the Data Analyst for Marketing and Engagement at Eastern Kentucky University.

Timothy Davis is an Engagement Analyst at Element451 and host of EduData.

Interviewee

No items found.

Other episodes

Episode 23: OpenAI’s Cyber Incident and the Rise of Open Weight ModelsPlay Button
Episode 23: OpenAI’s Cyber Incident and the Rise of Open Weight Models

JC unpacks two headline-making AI stories every campus and institution needs to understand right now.

Episode 101: Why Strategy Should Come Before ToolsPlay Button
Episode 101: Why Strategy Should Come Before Tools

Artificial intelligence is changing how higher education teams work, but successful AI adoption is about much more than choosing the right tools.

Episode 127: Higher Ed's Hero CyclePlay Button
Episode 127: Higher Ed's Hero Cycle

Mallory hosts Higher Ed Pulse with guest Jenn Hayes, Associate Dean for Marketing & Communications at Cardozo School of Law in New York, to discuss higher ed’s recurring “hero” cycle: hiring passionate leaders to rebuild broken systems, celebrating visible wins, and then losing them to burnout.

Ep. 71: How ECU Built a Collaborative Communications Team Across CampusPlay Button
Ep. 71: How ECU Built a Collaborative Communications Team Across Campus

Jenny Li Fowler welcomes Jessica VanderKolk, a Public Communications Specialist at East Carolina University. The conversation centers on ECU’s innovative communications department structure, which utilizes a liaison model. Rather than being siloed in a central office, communicators are embedded directly within the colleges they cover.

Ep. 50: How 24/7 Student Support AI Drives True Equity in Higher EducationPlay Button
Ep. 50: How 24/7 Student Support AI Drives True Equity in Higher Education

When Massachusetts rolled out free community college, it drove massive equity across the state, but it also created an unprecedented bottleneck at the front door of smaller institutions. Brian sits down with Alex Russo, Director of Enrollment & Recruitment Strategy at Cape Cod Community College, to discuss how a school with limited headcount operationalized 24/7 student support AI to manage a sudden 40% spike in student volume.

Weekly ideas that make you smarter

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Subscribe
cancel

Search podcasts, blog posts, people