The AI Workforce for Higher Ed is Here |

Talk to a Bolt Agent
EP
34
August 9, 2024
Episode 34: Ice Cream, Sharks, and Phlebotomists: Correlation vs. Causation in Higher Education Studies

Ice Cream, Sharks, and Phlebotomists: Correlation vs. Causation in Higher Education Studies

Or listen on:

About the Episode

About the Episode: 

In this episode of the EduData Podcast, hosts Jamie and Timothy dive head-first into the critical distinction between correlation and causation within higher education research. They revisit last week's discussion on ROI in higher and lower-income serving institutions and expand the conversation to explore how studies often grapple with the challenge of proving cause and effect. Jamie and Timothy offer insightful examples, such as the seemingly bizarre correlations between ice cream sales and shark attacks, to illustrate the complexities and limitations of observational research. They emphasize the importance of critical thinking and the cautious interpretation of study results. Tune in to understand why correlation does not imply causation and how to navigate the nuances of educational data research.

‍

Key Takeaways

  • Correlation ≠ Causation: Understanding this distinction is vital when analyzing data, especially in higher education research. Not all relationships imply causality.
  • Observational vs. Experimental Studies: Higher education relies heavily on observational data, which limits the ability to draw causal conclusions.
  • Lurking Variables: Unseen factors often influence correlations, making it essential to critically evaluate the data.
  • Critical Consumption of Studies: Always review study limitations and approach findings with a balanced mix of skepticism and appreciation.
  • Practical Applications in Higher Ed: While perfect causation may be elusive, patterns in data still provide actionable insights for improving student success and institutional ROI.

‍

Episode Summary

What Is the Difference Between Correlation and Causation?

Jamie and Timothy start by unpacking the core concept of the episode: the difference between correlation and causation. Correlation identifies a relationship between two variables but does not confirm that one causes the other. This distinction is often misunderstood, leading to misleading conclusions in research. Using quirky examples—like the correlation between U.S. household fruit spending and Canadian railway stock prices—they highlight how unrelated factors can show statistically significant relationships without being causally linked.

‍

How Do Observational Studies Compare to Experimental Research?

Higher education data is almost exclusively observational, meaning researchers analyze existing data without manipulating variables. Unlike experimental studies, which can prove causation through controlled environments, observational studies can only demonstrate correlation. Timothy explains the scientific rigor required for reliable conclusions and why true causation is nearly impossible to establish in human-centered fields like higher education.

The hosts emphasize the importance of experimental design in other fields, such as medicine, and the lack of such designs in higher ed research. They note that while observational data cannot prove causality, it still offers invaluable insights into trends and patterns.

‍

What Are Some Real-World Examples of Misinterpreted Correlations?

Jamie and Timothy introduce humorous examples to drive home the complexity of interpreting correlations. From the link between ice cream sales and shark attacks to the decline of the name Christopher correlating with fewer burglaries in Oklahoma, they underscore how spurious correlations can mislead if not carefully analyzed.

In higher education, Timothy shares a practical example: correlating teacher salaries with beer sales might seem bizarre until a lurking variable—city population size—is factored in. These illustrations remind listeners to critically assess data, especially in higher ed, where numerous factors impact outcomes like enrollment and student success.

‍

Why Is Critical Evaluation of Data Crucial in Higher Education?

The conversation shifts to practical advice for higher education professionals. Jamie and Timothy stress the importance of scrutinizing study limitations and understanding the context of data collection. They encourage listeners to balance skepticism with an appreciation for the insights research can offer, urging professionals to use patterns in data to inform—but not dictate—decision-making.

‍

Connect With Our Co-Hosts:

Jamie Boggs
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiewboggs/

Timothy Davis
https://www.linkedin.com/in/davis-timothy/

‍

About The Enrollify Podcast Network: The EduData Podcast is a part of the Enrollify Podcast Network. If you like this podcast, chances are you’ll like other Enrollify shows too!  

Some of our favorites include Generation AI and The Higher Ed Geek.

Enrollify is made possible by Element451 —  the next-generation AI student engagement platform helping institutions create meaningful and personalized interactions with students. Learn more at element451.com. 

People in this episode

Host

Jamie Boggs is the Data Analyst for Marketing and Engagement at Eastern Kentucky University.

Timothy Davis is an Engagement Analyst at Element451 and host of EduData.

Interviewee

No items found.

Other episodes

Episode 24: AI and the Future of WorkPlay Button
Episode 24: AI and the Future of Work

Host JC Bonilla hits reset to refocus Higher Intelligence on what AI means for the future of work. To help find the answers, he's joined by a new team of Enrollify experts from across higher ed and the EdTech landscape — Alison Turcio, Brian Piper, Carrie Phillips, and Rishabh Malhotra.

with
JC
Episode 140: Is Your Social Data Driving Decisions?Play Button
Episode 140: Is Your Social Data Driving Decisions?

Mallory is joined by Perry Rockwood, Social Media Manager at BYU-Idaho, to explore how his team uses weekly engagement data like saves and shares to shape content strategy.

Pulse Check: What Do We Really Need? — Pt 5Play Button
Pulse Check: What Do We Really Need? — Pt 5

In the final episode of What Do We Really Need?, Ologie Marketing Director Erin Fields talks with Doug Edwards, Ologie’s Chief Strategy Officer, about turning that request into useful direction

Ep. 57: How to Augment Admissions Strategy with AI Without Losing the Human TouchPlay Button
Ep. 57: How to Augment Admissions Strategy with AI Without Losing the Human Touch

Host Brian Piper speaks with Scott Clyde, Chief Growth Officer at enroll ml, about the evolving role of artificial intelligence in higher education admissions and enrollment strategy.

Bonus: Modernizing Higher Ed From the Inside OutPlay Button
Bonus: Modernizing Higher Ed From the Inside Out

Murtaza Masood, Vice President for Public Sector and Higher Education Strategy and Go-to-Market at Box, discusses the infrastructure and staffing pressures facing colleges and universities—and how institutions can use cloud modernization, automation, and AI to eliminate redundant work and free people to focus on higher-value priorities. 

Weekly ideas that make you smarter

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Subscribe
cancel

Search podcasts, blog posts, people