Join us on February 25-26 for the AI Engage Summit  |

Register Today
EP
34
August 9, 2024
Episode 34: Ice Cream, Sharks, and Phlebotomists: Correlation vs. Causation in Higher Education Studies

Ice Cream, Sharks, and Phlebotomists: Correlation vs. Causation in Higher Education Studies

Or listen on:

About the Episode

About the Episode: 

In this episode of the EduData Podcast, hosts Jamie and Timothy dive head-first into the critical distinction between correlation and causation within higher education research. They revisit last week's discussion on ROI in higher and lower-income serving institutions and expand the conversation to explore how studies often grapple with the challenge of proving cause and effect. Jamie and Timothy offer insightful examples, such as the seemingly bizarre correlations between ice cream sales and shark attacks, to illustrate the complexities and limitations of observational research. They emphasize the importance of critical thinking and the cautious interpretation of study results. Tune in to understand why correlation does not imply causation and how to navigate the nuances of educational data research.

Key Takeaways

  • Correlation ≠ Causation: Understanding this distinction is vital when analyzing data, especially in higher education research. Not all relationships imply causality.
  • Observational vs. Experimental Studies: Higher education relies heavily on observational data, which limits the ability to draw causal conclusions.
  • Lurking Variables: Unseen factors often influence correlations, making it essential to critically evaluate the data.
  • Critical Consumption of Studies: Always review study limitations and approach findings with a balanced mix of skepticism and appreciation.
  • Practical Applications in Higher Ed: While perfect causation may be elusive, patterns in data still provide actionable insights for improving student success and institutional ROI.

Episode Summary

What Is the Difference Between Correlation and Causation?

Jamie and Timothy start by unpacking the core concept of the episode: the difference between correlation and causation. Correlation identifies a relationship between two variables but does not confirm that one causes the other. This distinction is often misunderstood, leading to misleading conclusions in research. Using quirky examples—like the correlation between U.S. household fruit spending and Canadian railway stock prices—they highlight how unrelated factors can show statistically significant relationships without being causally linked.

How Do Observational Studies Compare to Experimental Research?

Higher education data is almost exclusively observational, meaning researchers analyze existing data without manipulating variables. Unlike experimental studies, which can prove causation through controlled environments, observational studies can only demonstrate correlation. Timothy explains the scientific rigor required for reliable conclusions and why true causation is nearly impossible to establish in human-centered fields like higher education.

The hosts emphasize the importance of experimental design in other fields, such as medicine, and the lack of such designs in higher ed research. They note that while observational data cannot prove causality, it still offers invaluable insights into trends and patterns.

What Are Some Real-World Examples of Misinterpreted Correlations?

Jamie and Timothy introduce humorous examples to drive home the complexity of interpreting correlations. From the link between ice cream sales and shark attacks to the decline of the name Christopher correlating with fewer burglaries in Oklahoma, they underscore how spurious correlations can mislead if not carefully analyzed.

In higher education, Timothy shares a practical example: correlating teacher salaries with beer sales might seem bizarre until a lurking variable—city population size—is factored in. These illustrations remind listeners to critically assess data, especially in higher ed, where numerous factors impact outcomes like enrollment and student success.

Why Is Critical Evaluation of Data Crucial in Higher Education?

The conversation shifts to practical advice for higher education professionals. Jamie and Timothy stress the importance of scrutinizing study limitations and understanding the context of data collection. They encourage listeners to balance skepticism with an appreciation for the insights research can offer, urging professionals to use patterns in data to inform—but not dictate—decision-making.

Connect With Our Co-Hosts:

Jamie Boggs
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiewboggs/

Timothy Davis
https://www.linkedin.com/in/davis-timothy/

About The Enrollify Podcast Network: The EduData Podcast is a part of the Enrollify Podcast Network. If you like this podcast, chances are you’ll like other Enrollify shows too!  

Some of our favorites include Generation AI and The Higher Ed Geek.

Enrollify is made possible by Element451 —  the next-generation AI student engagement platform helping institutions create meaningful and personalized interactions with students. Learn more at element451.com

People in this episode

Host

Jamie Boggs is a Senior Engagement Analyst at Element451 and host of EduData.

Timothy Davis is an Engagement Analyst at Element451 and host of EduData.

Interviewee

No items found.

Other episodes

Bonus: After Further Consideration Part 2Play Button
Bonus: After Further Consideration Part 2

Revisit a conversation with Kevin McDonald from Cody and Tomilka's Pulse Check series.

Episode #36: What’s Next for New Models of Community College Education?Play Button
Episode #36: What’s Next for New Models of Community College Education?

In this episode Ray is joined by Mike Belicose, CFO of Campus, to discuss the ways institutions can build a more inclusive and the future for higher education.

Ep. 32: From Silos to Synergy: Connecting Central Comms and Student Affairs Play Button
Ep. 32: From Silos to Synergy: Connecting Central Comms and Student Affairs

In this episode of Confessions of a Higher Ed Social Media Manager, Jenny Li Fowler chats with Josie Ahlquist, a trailblazer in the higher education community.

Pulse Check: Strategic Storytelling: The Art and Science of Brand Narratives — Pt. 1Play Button
Pulse Check: Strategic Storytelling: The Art and Science of Brand Narratives — Pt. 1

Matt McFadden and Maria Kuntz talk about embracing the fact that universities are mega brands and how this should influence the way we market to different audiences through a values-based brand platform.

Episode 23: Efficiency, Engagement, and Element451: COA’s Winning FormulaPlay Button
Episode 23: Efficiency, Engagement, and Element451: COA’s Winning Formula

Brendan and Daniella sit down with Brittany Meinssen, Director of Admissions and Recruitment at College of the Albemarle (COA), to uncover how her team is reshaping recruitment strategies for community colleges.

Weekly ideas that make you smarter

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Subscribe
cancel

Search podcasts, blog posts, people