The AI Workforce for Higher Ed is Here |

Talk to a Bolt Agent
EP
21
May 10, 2024
Episode 21: From A to Z: Exploring Decision Fatigue in Grading

From A to Z: Exploring Decision Fatigue in Grading

Or listen on:

About the Episode

About the Episode: 

In this episode, Jamie and Timothy dive into the fascinating world of decision fatigue and its impact on grading practices in higher education. Drawing from a study conducted at the University of Michigan, which analyzed over 30 million grading records, Jamie and Timothy discuss how individuals with last names lower in alphabetical order tend to receive worse grades due to decision fatigue among graders. They explore various causes of decision fatigue and its effects on grading outcomes, shedding light on biases such as anchoring bias and sequential grading biases. Furthermore, they examine potential solutions to mitigate decision fatigue, including randomization techniques and reducing class sizes. Join in the conversation to share valuable insights into the challenges of grading practices and the importance of designing equitable systems in education.

Articles:

Link to Michigan study

Link to Journal of Athletic Training study on randomization

 

Key Takeaways

  • Sequential Grading Bias Is Real:
    • Students graded later in a sequence (e.g., alphabetical order by last name) receive lower grades on average due to decision fatigue.
    • A University of Michigan study showed students with last names in the W-Z range scored an average of 0.6 points lower than those in the A-C range.
  • Decision Fatigue Goes Beyond Grading:
    • The phenomenon impacts various fields, including medicine, sports officiating, and judicial rulings. For example:
      • Doctors are more likely to miss diagnoses later in the day.
      • Judges grant fewer paroles as the day progresses.
  • Practical Solutions for Educators:
    • Randomization: Avoid alphabetical grading order; instead, randomize the sequence of review.
    • Smaller Class Sizes: Reducing the number of assignments per grader minimizes fatigue.
    • Rubric Simplification: Implement binary (yes/no) rubrics to make grading more objective and less mentally taxing.
    • Breaks and Self-Awareness: Encourage graders to take regular breaks to avoid the cumulative effects of fatigue.

Episode Summary

The Science of Decision Fatigue in Grading

Jamie and Timothy explore the fascinating concept of sequential grading bias, as revealed by a large-scale study at the University of Michigan. By analyzing grading records from over a decade of learning management system (LMS) data, researchers found that students graded later in a sequence tend to receive lower scores and harsher comments from graders. This trend was especially pronounced in systems defaulting to alphabetical grading order, though the inverse occurred when grading began with Z and moved toward A.

The hosts relate this bias to broader research on decision fatigue, citing parallels in medicine, sports officiating, and even judicial rulings. For instance, doctors are less likely to maintain proper hygiene or catch medical conditions as their day progresses, and judges issue harsher sentences or deny parole more frequently in the afternoon.

Addressing Grading Bias

To combat grading inequities, Jamie and Timothy propose several actionable strategies:

  1. Adjusting LMS Defaults:
    • Many LMS platforms, like Canvas, sort submissions alphabetically by default. By shifting to randomized sorting as the default, institutions can distribute bias more equitably.
  2. Enhanced Randomization Techniques:
    • Beyond simple randomization, block randomization (grouping students by similar characteristics) and covariate adaptive randomization (considering prior sorting history) offer more sophisticated ways to ensure fairness.
  3. Structural Changes in Grading:
    • Reducing class sizes or distributing grading responsibilities across multiple reviewers can help alleviate individual fatigue.
    • Simplified rubrics and clearly defined criteria reduce cognitive load, fostering more consistent evaluations.
  4. Grader Self-Awareness:
    • Encouraging graders to recognize signs of fatigue and take regular breaks can help mitigate its effects. Maintaining a comfortable grading environment is also key.

The Bigger Picture: Decision Fatigue in Society

The conversation expands to consider how decision fatigue influences high-stakes decisions in various sectors. Whether it’s doctors diagnosing patients, judges granting parole, or sports referees officiating games, decision fatigue is a universal challenge. The hosts emphasize the importance of designing systems that account for human limitations, enabling more equitable and accurate outcomes.

Final Thoughts

Grading bias caused by decision fatigue is not just a theoretical concern—it has tangible consequences for students and educators alike. By adopting evidence-based strategies like randomized grading orders, smaller class sizes, and simplified rubrics, institutions can create fairer, more equitable learning environments.

For educators and administrators seeking actionable change, the hosts recommend starting small: leverage LMS tools to randomize grading order, and encourage regular breaks during grading sessions. As Timothy notes, designing better systems isn’t just about improving grades—it’s about improving the entire educational experience.

Connect With Our Co-Hosts:

Jamie Boggs
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiewboggs/

Timothy Davis
https://www.linkedin.com/in/davis-timothy/

About The Enrollify Podcast Network: The EduData Podcast is a part of the Enrollify Podcast Network. If you like this podcast, chances are you’ll like other Enrollify shows too!  

Some of our favorites include Generation AI and The Higher Ed Geek.

Enrollify is made possible by Element451 —  the next-generation AI student engagement platform helping institutions create meaningful and personalized interactions with students. Learn more at element451.com

Connect with Us at the Engage Summit: Exciting news — Jamie and Timothy will be at the 2024 Engage Summit in Raleigh, NC, on June 25 and 26, and we’d love to meet you there! Sessions will focus on cutting-edge AI applications that are reshaping student outreach, enhancing staff productivity, and offering deep insights into ROI. 

Use the discount code Enrollify50 at checkout, and you can register for just $200.

Learn more and register at engage.element451.com — we can’t wait to see you there!

People in this episode

Host

Timothy Davis is an Engagement Analyst at Element451 and host of EduData.

Jamie Boggs is the Data Analyst for Marketing and Engagement at Eastern Kentucky University.

Interviewee

No items found.

Other episodes

Episode #340: Creating Transparent Learning Experiences with AIPlay Button
Episode #340: Creating Transparent Learning Experiences with AI

For this week's episode, Dustin speaks with Jenny Maxwell of Superhuman about the evolving relationship between AI and academic integrity in higher education. They explore how institutions can move beyond viewing AI as a threat and instead embrace more transparent, collaborative approaches that help students learn with AI while maintaining trust, accountability, and meaningful assessment practices.

Episode 23: OpenAI’s Cyber Incident and the Rise of Open Weight ModelsPlay Button
Episode 23: OpenAI’s Cyber Incident and the Rise of Open Weight Models

JC unpacks two headline-making AI stories every campus and institution needs to understand right now.

Episode 101: Why Strategy Should Come Before ToolsPlay Button
Episode 101: Why Strategy Should Come Before Tools

Artificial intelligence is changing how higher education teams work, but successful AI adoption is about much more than choosing the right tools.

Episode 127: Higher Ed's Hero CyclePlay Button
Episode 127: Higher Ed's Hero Cycle

Mallory hosts Higher Ed Pulse with guest Jenn Hayes, Associate Dean for Marketing & Communications at Cardozo School of Law in New York, to discuss higher ed’s recurring “hero” cycle: hiring passionate leaders to rebuild broken systems, celebrating visible wins, and then losing them to burnout.

Ep. 71: How ECU Built a Collaborative Communications Team Across CampusPlay Button
Ep. 71: How ECU Built a Collaborative Communications Team Across Campus

Jenny Li Fowler welcomes Jessica VanderKolk, a Public Communications Specialist at East Carolina University. The conversation centers on ECU’s innovative communications department structure, which utilizes a liaison model. Rather than being siloed in a central office, communicators are embedded directly within the colleges they cover.

Weekly ideas that make you smarter

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Subscribe
cancel

Search podcasts, blog posts, people